Comments for unsafePerformHack

Comment on Real Modules for C++ by Rick Yorgason

Rick Yorgason — Fri, 03 Jul 2009 19:08:12 +0000

Hey, came across your post in a Google search. Just thought you’d be interested to know that the C++ working group has a proposal for adding modules to C++, and although it’s not going to make it into C++0x, it’s one of their higher priorities after C++0x. Take a look:

http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2007/n2316.pdf

Comment on Ant sucks. by Bill Cernansky

Bill Cernansky — Tue, 24 Feb 2009 22:11:59 +0000

I could not have said it better. As a CM and build/release engineer, I actually avoid jobs that “require” ANT usage. Horrible, horrible, horrible.

Comment on Ant sucks. by tom

tom — Tue, 27 Jan 2009 14:21:23 +0000

Yes, it really sucks! Other way to implement if/else is to use

… then

… else

Sucks even more, as it fills the ant script with 1000s of targets, and no possibility to mark them as “private” or so.

Whow – this webside sucks too! Cannot handle < in entries

… finally …

Comment on Literate Haskell Blogging by main = putStrLn “Hello, World!” « unsafeReadBlog

main = putStrLn “Hello, World!” « unsafeReadBlog — Tue, 20 Jan 2009 07:32:57 +0000

[...] *(Things getting markdown installed, and then getting it working with haskell hilighting. Shall be following in the steps of Conal Elliot and Olsner) [...]

Comment on Ant sucks. by Mikael Jansson

Mikael Jansson — Tue, 27 May 2008 22:52:37 +0000

Regarding the suckyness of ANT, see "The Nature of Lisp" http://www.defmacro.org/ramblings/lisp.html by Coffeemug. Very insightful!